Author: Dan
-
Willkommen bei den “Anonymen Ahnungslosen”
“Je höher ich gestiegen bin, wurde mir klar, dass da niemand ist, der weiß, was er tut.” Eine Ex-CEO Die „Anonymen Ahnungslosen“ benennt etwas, das im Top-Management fast durchgängig vorhanden ist, aber kollektiv verleugnet wird: strukturelle Ungewissheit, die mit persönlicher Identität verwechselt wird. Wer C-Level ist, lebt dauerhaft in Situationen, in denen niemand wirklich weiß,…
-
Leadership Myths (2): Control, Answers, and Other Comfort Stories
Once you start looking at leadership myths as coping stories, a pattern becomes hard to ignore. Most of them don’t actually describe leadership. They describe how systems deal with fear. Fear of uncertainty. Fear of losing control. Fear of becoming irrelevant. Fear of not being needed anymore. And like all good coping stories, these myths…
-
Body vs. Soul
“As long as we pay more attention to bellies than to souls, we will continue to see humans primarily as machines.” — Dan, OrgIQ.org For a long time, I’ve been carrying a very simple thought. Uncomfortably simple. As long as our systems focus first on bellies — pay, efficiency, utilization, output — we will inevitably…
-
Relationship Quality As a Hard Economic Factor
(And How OrgIQ Makes It Measurable) Most organizations still talk about relationships as if they were a cultural side topic. Important, yes — but somehow separate from “real” business metrics like cost, speed, risk, or profit. Nice to have, but not relevant. That separation is the blind spot. What the OrgIQ work — and especially…
-
Leadership Myths (1): The Loneliness at the Top
There is one leadership story almost everyone knows. It shows up in books, interviews, LinkedIn posts, late-night conversations at conferences. “It’s lonely at the top.” Sometimes it’s framed as a warning. Sometimes as a badge of honor. Sometimes as the unavoidable price of responsibility. And many people in leadership roles recognize the feeling immediately. The…
-
Basics of Trust (3): Forgiveness Is Not a Reset (Repair Is the Work)
When trust breaks, the first word that usually shows up is forgiveness. It sounds right. Warm. Mature. Almost noble. We forgive so we can move on, so things can be normal again, so the tension finally stops. And that’s already the first misunderstanding. Because forgiveness is not what fixes trust. What forgiveness actually does Forgiveness…
-
Basics of Trust (2): How Trust Breaks (and Why We Usually Miss It)
When people talk about broken trust, they almost always point to an event. A decision. A sentence. A moment that changed everything. That makes sense. Events are visible. They give us something to hold on to. A clear before and after. But if you look a little closer — at your own life, at teams…
-
Basics of Trust (1): Trust Is Not What We Think
We talk about trust a lot. In organizations, in leadership conversations, in relationships. Often exactly in the moments when something already feels off. Everyone agrees that trust is important, everyone claims to value it — and still, it keeps breaking in places where no one expected it. That’s usually the first hint that we don’t…
-
No More Meetings
Meetings are not the problem I’ve been thinking about meetings for a long time. Not because I enjoy thinking about them, but because they keep getting in the way. And the longer I watch organizations, the clearer one thing becomes: meetings are rarely the problem people think they are. They’re a symptom. Here’s the core…
-
We are Complex Systems Anyway — Now Look at the Implications
We Pretend the World Is Simple — and Then Punish People for Its Complexity Most of our everyday systems are built on an unspoken agreement: that humans, teams, and organizations are complicated, perhaps — but ultimately manageable through the right rules, incentives, and structures. Complexity is acknowledged rhetorically and ignored architecturally. This is not a…